comments
| (1) name! | |||
| Tue, 2 March 2010 05:19:54 -0800 |
seems like a waste of money for web hosting and server space.
| (2) Stan | |||
| Sat, 13 February 2010 10:19:15 -0800 |
Uma still has it! - so clean and real - especially when compared to that dirty
Paris Hilton image.
Was there a lot of Photoshop time involved?
Do you do family portraits?
Paris Hilton image.
Was there a lot of Photoshop time involved?
Do you do family portraits?
| (3) daniel | |||
| Sat, 9 January 2010 13:25:50 -0800 |
um is there supposed to be anything on this site apart from some blocky pixels? i dont see the point?
| (4) shaw | |||
| Sat, 2 January 2010 09:12:58 -0800 |
it's a bit weird: even thought i loved the irony, the mockery in your work, and even if i am one of the "victims" of your pointy critic, i still think that your art work is "exiting" enough, i wish to be able to react more to squares/enlarged pixels i couldn't. not yet! can you make a little effort on the sex appeal of your squares?
thank's! irony
thank's! irony
| (5) bob | |||
| Tue, 8 December 2009 17:59:13 -0800 |
me