comments



 Name *
 Email
 Website
 Text *
* Mandatory

Antispam measures
Please insert the correct number below.
6 + 5 =
(49)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
>
(1) name!
Tue, 2 March 2010 05:19:54 -0800

seems like a waste of money for web hosting and server space.
(2) Stan
Sat, 13 February 2010 10:19:15 -0800

Uma still has it! - so clean and real - especially when compared to that dirty
Paris Hilton image.
Was there a lot of Photoshop time involved?

Do you do family portraits?
(3) daniel
Sat, 9 January 2010 13:25:50 -0800

um is there supposed to be anything on this site apart from some blocky pixels? i dont see the point?
(4) shaw
Sat, 2 January 2010 09:12:58 -0800

it's a bit weird: even thought i loved the irony, the mockery in your work, and even if i am one of the "victims" of your pointy critic, i still think that your art work is "exiting" enough, i wish to be able to react more to squares/enlarged pixels i couldn't. not yet! can you make a little effort on the sex appeal of your squares?
thank's! irony
(5) bob
Tue, 8 December 2009 17:59:13 -0800

me
>